Dallas, Texas – In the aftermath of a protracted, four-year public discourse revolving around the contentious issue of short-term rental properties, the Dallas City Council has finally imposed zoning restrictions effectively expelling such operations from single-family residential zones.
In an act of appeasement designed to balance competing interests, the city council has granted short-term rentals (STRs) a reprieve, allowing their continued operation within commercial zones as well as multi-family neighborhoods.
The landmark decision was reached by a decisive 12-to-3 majority vote, coming on the heels of a more tightly contested vote that failed to protect existing STRs operating within single-family neighborhoods – despite these establishments dutifully remitting hotel taxes. The failed motion faced a close defeat, with a vote tally of 7 in favor, and 8 against.
In a companion move, the council approved regulations governing the operation of the remaining STRs, slated to come into effect in December. This delay in enforcement is a strategic measure that affords STR operators an opportunity to scale down operations, while simultaneously granting city code enforcement sufficient time to ramp up their operations to meet the challenges posed by the new regulatory environment.
Wednesday’s city council meeting at the Dallas City Hall was the epicenter of a highly charged debate, drawing an equally impassioned and divided crowd. Participants held their collective breath, each side harboring hopes that the decision would tilt in their favor.
A testament to the high-stakes nature of this issue, a roster of 60 individuals – eager to voice their perspective on the issue – populated the council’s public speakers list. Under normal circumstances, public hearings commence at 1 pm; however, given the lengthiness of Wednesday’s agenda, the voices of STR-related speakers did not echo in the chambers until the late hour of 6:30 pm. A long-drawn-out council discussion ensued, culminating in the final vote at around 11:30 pm.
This pivotal meeting marked the concluding voting session for two council members, whose terms have reached their limit, barring them from continuing their service in office.
The final week leading up to the decision saw a surprising twist, as city staff deflected from the Dallas Plan Commission’s recommendation from the previous year. They introduced an unexpected element to the ongoing debate by issuing a formal recommendation that ran counter to the Plan Commission’s earlier proposal.
Read also: Short-Term Rentals Future in Texas Uncertain
At the forefront of the STR opposition was Olive Talley, who assumed a leadership role in the fight against short-term rentals.
“We are looking to save homes and housing and neighborhoods,” Talley said.
Lisa Sievers, a host involved in the short-term rental industry, recently offered her insights on the contentious issue surrounding their operation.
“We have zero 311 calls, zero 911 calls and we don’t allow any parties at our short-term rentals,” Sievers said.
However, despite such self-regulation, city officials have observed that while a significant majority of known short-term rentals have not instigated city complaints, a handful have become notorious for extreme disturbances including gunfire and raucous parties. Such incidents have sparked considerable anxiety amongst neighboring residents.
Critics of the short-term rental industry argue that these businesses deprive the local community of much-needed housing opportunities intended for long-term rental tenants. The Dallas Plan Commission lent weight to this view by recommending the categorization of short-term rentals as “lodging,” a classification which is prohibited in areas zoned for single-family residences.
In line with this recommendation, the city council approved a similar stance but included a noteworthy amendment: an exception for multi-family zones. This decision potentially brings an abrupt halt to more than 1,000 currently active short-term rentals. Olive Talley, an influential voice in the debate
“We are saying we don’t want lodging business, hotels, to be operating in areas that are zoned for residential purposes,” Talley said.
As the Dallas City Council readied for the decisive vote, city staff surprised many by diverging from the proposed zoning approach. Instead, they suggested an open policy, allowing short-term rentals to operate freely but under the constraint of regulations that could potentially limit their operation in specific areas. This approach also envisaged more stringent rules than Dallas had previously seen.
One such proposed regulation was the imposition of an annual fee amounting to $248 per short-term rental. These funds would be allocated to bolster the resources of code enforcement, an area that has historically been understaffed in addressing short-term rental issues. Sievers defended the new levy.
“This is all paid by the short-term rental people, OK? Money to fund the extra enforcement officers, who work nights and weekends, which is when these kinds of issues happen,” Sievers said.
The scheduling for Wednesday’s Dallas City Council meeting saw short-term rental proponents expecting to air their views from 1 p.m., yet a lengthy agenda resulted in a delay, pushing their opportunity to speak until 6 p.m.
Despite the reduction in short-term rentals, the new regulations stipulate that registration fees continue to be collected from remaining STRs. However, the diminished pool will likely yield less funding for enforcement. Another regulation introduced was a requirement for off-street parking, mandating one space per bedroom for each short-term rental.
Further details concerning the regulations, such as the number of short-term rentals permissible in multi-family areas, remain to be clarified in future deliberations.